The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these forces affected three regions of the world during 1990.
The given circular chart illustrates the four main reasons behind the less productivity of agricultural land, and linear chart below it, reveals the Globally affected regions by four activities during the period of 1990. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and coherently representated.
It can be seen that, more than a third; Land Degradation is only caused by overgrazing, whereas, 7% land is degraded by other factors. Moreover, deforestation is being considered as one of another major cause of degradation of land; as it comprises 30% of total. In addition to this, 28% agricultural land become less productive due to over-cultivation.
Apart from all this, North America lost it's one in a 20 agricultural land, because of a four activities. Subsequently, 23% land is degraded in Europe in which 9.8% has been due to deforestation. Lastly, in oceania degradation of land by: deforestation, overgrazing and over cultivation is 1.7%, 11.3% and 0 respectively.
Overall, it is evident that overgrazing activity is the major cause of Land Degradation as compared to other three main reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-22 | Jashandeepkaur | 92 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | Jashandeepkaur | 84 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of silkworm and stages in the production of silk cloth. 90
- The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in US from 1950 to 2000.It also predicts the figures of 2025 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these forces affected three regions of the world during 1990. 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these forces affected three regions of the world during 1990. 92
- The given data shows student per lecture in practice-based and lecture-based subjects in King's college in UK. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gradation is only caused by overgrazing, whereas, 7% land is degraded by other fa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, moreover, so, third, whereas, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30898876404 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35331144381 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1578004149 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206013009458 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802855784688 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842783904826 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127194415852 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723115991949 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.