The bar chart shows information about people’s drinking behavior by age group in the US. Several
trends are
evident.
The highest proportion of those who never drink (nearly two-thirds) was in the 16 to 24 years
group. The proportion tended to decrease with age. Only 40 per cent of people aged 65 to 74 had
never drink.
On the other hand, the percentage of those who had quit drinking tended to increase with age. Only
5 per cent of those in the youngest age group (16 to 24) were ex-drinkers, as opposed to roughly 40
per cent of those aged 65 to 75.
The percentage of those classed as heavy drinkers also showed a distinct pattern. People in middle
age (35 to
54) tended to be the heaviest drinkers – approximately 13 per cent of the total. A relatively small
proportion of those in the youngest age group, and an even smaller percentage of those in the
oldest group (roughly 3 per cent) drink heavily.
Overall, age appears to be a significant factor in patterns of drinking behavior.
The highest proportion of those who never drink (nearly two-thirds) was in the 16 to 24 years
group. The proportion tended to decrease with age. Only 40 per cent of people aged 65 to 74 had
never drink.
On the other hand, the percentage of those who had quit drinking tended to increase with age. Only
5 per cent of those in the youngest age group (16 to 24) were ex-drinkers, as opposed to roughly 40
per cent of those aged 65 to 75.
The percentage of those classed as heavy drinkers also showed a distinct pattern. People in middle
age (35 to
54) tended to be the heaviest drinkers – approximately 13 per cent of the total. A relatively small
proportion of those in the youngest age group, and an even smaller percentage of those in the
oldest group (roughly 3 per cent) drink heavily.
- The line chart above compares waste products in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that company A and B tended to produce less waste than they used to by the beginning. On the other hand, company C’s rate 67
- The line chart above compares waste output in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year period). In contrast, the amount of was 73
- he line chart above compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey, which the Americans consumed each year between 1995 and 2012.It is clear from the chart that both broilers and turkey flesh eating, increased significantly from 1960 to 2012 while 78
- The line chart above shows changes in the average money spent every month on children’s sports by parents from 2008 to 2010. The following graph compares the number of children taking part in three different physical activities, which are football, athl 73
- The line chart above compares the difference in the consumption of the four types of boneless meat of four different species per capita.It is clear that there were significant changes in the choice of meat in the US from 1955 to 2012. In general, beef and 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rly two-thirds was in the 16 to 24 years group. The proportion tended to decrease...
^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 40 per cent of people aged 65 to 74 had never drink. On the other hand, the per...
^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'drank', 'drunk'.
Suggestion: drank; drunk
...ent of people aged 65 to 74 had never drink. On the other hand, the percentage of ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inking tended to increase with age. Only 5 per cent of those in the youngest age ...
^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re ex-drinkers, as opposed to roughly 40 per cent of those aged 65 to 75. The pe...
^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wed a distinct pattern. People in middle age 35 to 54 tended to be the heaviest ...
^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er cent of the total. A relatively small proportion of those in the youngest age ...
^^^
Line 10, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... even smaller percentage of those in the oldest group roughly 3 per cent drink he...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 658.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50684931507 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53398739882 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513698630137 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.972751791 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.25 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3891405697 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210687096849 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147370571412 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172148158722 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135354368795 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.