The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990.
The given circular chart illustrates the causes of Land Degradation, and tabular chart represents how the three region of the world affected by these causes since 1990.The data is calibrated in percentage.
It is clearly seen from the pie chart that, the major causes of worldwide Land Degradation was overgrazing, which was 35%. Secondly, 28% of degradation occured due to the over cultivation, while percentage decreased by 2% in the case of deforestation. At last, only 7% of degradation caused by others.
Moving further, it is clear evident from table chart that in North America 0.2% 3.3% and 1.5 % of land Degradation originating from deforestation, over-cultivation and overgrazing respectively, whereas in Europe, proportion of deforestation raised to 9.8%, 7.7%, and 5.5% in order. Finally, in oceania, 1.7 % of the land degradation occured by deforestation and 11.3% caused by overgrazing, however there was no effect of cultivation.
Overall, it is evident that overgrazing is the major effect cause on land degradation compared to the other main causes especially in Europe
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-23 | Jagroop Brar | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | DavinderPB46 | 67 | view |
- Many people suffer from insomnia What do you think is it caused by increasing pace of life for the individuals lifestyle is at fault 16
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The diagrams below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 78
- In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...rld affected by these causes since 1990.The data is calibrated in percentage. It...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, second, secondly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47337278107 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32659624911 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2467281656 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217208284308 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993575503757 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932523912333 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147424845021 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950657051704 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.