Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.
Generally, people prefer to avoid loneliness to find some friends, also people always connect friendly with who has the same characteristics with them. However, a controversial issue in this regard is that people can easily learn from their friends beside them. In my opinion, people try to learn some identities from their friends whether appropriate or not. I will elaborate my reasons about this stance hereunder.
First and foremost, by and large, people are highly receptive to people living with them according to what they are doing, and they are appealing to imitate some properties from another person, so eventually, they will be the same of their friends in terms of characteristics. Also, some friends upset their friends with some disgusting behavior, so their friend makes a lot of attempts to modify this awful behavior to get their friend’s satisfaction. For example, I strongly opposed to laying and dislike this act, so my friend changes his behavior only for me because he has been a professional layer that act makes me feel irritation.
The second reason comes to my mind is that friends have a significant role in the success of their friends. Typically, all people have a friend who has a lot of efforts to get his desires, so this friend conveniently affects his friends. In other words, when people are seeing his efforts to take advantageous, people are persuaded to make considerable attempts to reach their noteworthy wishes. Also, this friend provides some advice for his friends to ease the hardship of path since he experienced many predicaments and solved it with his own efforts. The statistical standpoint indicates people having friendly friends more are successful in their lives than people who live lonely.
All in all, in my opinion, I profoundly agree with this statement that people easily affect the intimate friends, and they can achieve some benefits from these friendly connections. I think no one can deny these rewarding experiences of their friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | Kumari Soni | 60 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | mahi22 | 66 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | Angelina2016 | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | mahi22 | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-05 | zabanfinish | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily. 66
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 76
- The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to charities 60
- If you had a presentation in a month, would you rather prepare for it from now or would you postpone it to the last days. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, for example, i think, by and large, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14067278287 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82387381025 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535168195719 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9084636118 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204062568845 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906755904856 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745384946489 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146678328255 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059268291025 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.