Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of following topic.
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Use your own ideas. Knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence.
Developed and prosperous nations are often criticized for their amassed wealth and resources and it is opinion of some people that these countries should assist the underdeveloped and deprived countries by allowing them to share their financial and other resources. Others believe that it is the responsibility of desolate countries to take care about their people. In my view, the under-privileged countries can only be lifted above the poverty if they are determined to do so with the guidance and help of wealth nations.
It is commonly said that the best use of money is to eradicate the poverty in the world and it is the responsibility in some sense of developed nations to help the deprived one’s living in other parts of world too. Depending on the generosity and kindheartedness, few developed nations share the common vision and set-up facilities at their cost in poor countries which not only financially support the people but also provide directions for long term solutions. For example, The United Nations is an umbrella organization majorly run by the developed nations and works in underdeveloped and war torn countries for helping common people.
However, some citizens in poor countries do not like the excessive help and believe that incumbent government should device the program for their homelanders and they have valid reasons. Firstly, international organization or other counties may not be able to find out the real cause of problems and their financial assistance may go in vain. For instance, in Syria the real cause of instability and employment is rising extremism which is leading famine and abysmal health services. Secondly, few aid organizations from developed countries start as helping organization and later on become conglomerate by exploiting the country’s resources and even making the poor country more sufferer.
To recapitulate, though sharing resources with other country is noble idea and developed nation must offer help, the deprived nations should be determined to end the plights of citizens and in this course, they may seek guidance from such nations and sometimes financial aids to run their program targeting alleviation of quality of life.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You should write at least 150 words.You are not satisfied with the changing room in the sports center that you visit. Write a letter to the manager, in your letter say:- what the problem is,- how you feel abo 78
- You had recently joined a morning course but now you can’t continue as you have got a job. Write a letter to the course instructor explaining why you can’t continue the course, how it can be difficult for you to manage your job and the course etc.You 56
- Technology development has made the traditional skills and ways of life die out 83
- Most people accept that we are now living in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalisation is a positive or negative development? 56
- Air travel only benefits the richest people The majority of people get no advantage from development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32951289398 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01390989307 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518624641834 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5873837479 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.090909091 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7272727273 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150563532131 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630562979688 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522314796024 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112265700709 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516916507092 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.