Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of extreme sports has sparked an ongoing controversy, which
inevitably leads to a moot question “are there reasons to support these activities?”. Whereas
it is a widely held view that sports like bungee jumping seem more deleterious rather than
constructive, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sports medicine standpoint, adventurous sports are bound up inextricably with the youth interest, which indicates they might lead to both mental and physical health. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between risky sports and excitement as well as an exponential increase inthe adrenalin rush. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to vigorous exercise, unusual experience, and body reaction alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of being life-threatening is positively correlated with not only serious injuries but also reducing depression in risk-taking sports.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, exciting sports attribute to social inequalities, in that it would come down to lucrative sports, the expensive equipment, and
fame and fortune for athletes. A salient example of such attribution is spectator sports, which
is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take these stressful situations for granted. Had
there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint
recreational sports’ problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the competition, rivalry, and even challenges. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of
modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of socioeconomic dimensions of extreme sports.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what
elaborated above, I firmly believe that there are some reasons to support dangerous
activities. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the
further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-27 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 77
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question &apo...
^^^
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...support these activities?'. Whereas it is a widely held view that sports lik...
^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umping seem more deleterious rather than constructive, I will discuss controversi...
^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...f that throughout this essay. From the sports medicine standpoint, adventurous sports...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive sports, the expensive equipment, and fame and fortune for athletes. A salient...
^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h attribution is spectator sports, which is a cause for concern since it was mist...
^^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se stressful situations for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, sch...
^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght have had the opportunity to pinpoint recreational sports' problems. Like...
^^^
Line 10, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonabl...
^^^
Line 12, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated abov...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that ...
^^^
Line 13, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re are some reasons to support dangerous activities. However, with the benefit of...
^^^
Line 14, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1207.87684729 158% => OK
No of words: 321.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94704049844 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30330316548 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 139.433497537 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691588785047 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6269227204 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.266666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.12807881773 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 5.33497536946 244% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152862938422 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396317147611 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055248884393 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536952966021 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573851294931 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 55.0591133005 227% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.