Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reducing investment in arts by government can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, government reduce their investment in arts can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, government reduce investment in music and painting might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of reducing investment government in arts far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- Do you think extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc. are dangerous and should be prohibited? 88
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it isimportant for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79766536965 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26761152005 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63813229572 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4709829472 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.454545455 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251513579555 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907225537569 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117294937495 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145511373483 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797849272208 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.