Some people believe that population explosion is not a serious problem because the world has enough resources to support this issue.
In our society nowadays, population density is becoming an alarming problem in every aspect of life. Recently, it is argued that there are adequate resources to solve the population explosion so it is not a serious problem anymore. I totally disagree with that point of view because of many reasons.
Regarding the environment, the more is the world bustling, the more it is extremely polluted. Looking the former, people are the main reasons causing contamination nowadays. It is identified that the green environment is replace by the pollution gradually because of the habits of human. Air pollution, for instance, dramatically increases since CO2 is emitted by factories and transportation. To conclude. Should people be knowledgeable of population, the environment will not have deteriorated effects.
As far as government is concerned they have diversity concerns so they cannot just pay attention on population explosion only. With regard to resources, there various kind of issues needing to be subsidized rather than population density. An explanation for this could be that the authority do not have enough money to cover all problems happening. It is exemplified that the destitute are waiting for being supportive by financial aid of the government. To sum up, should population explosion be lessened without the authority, the other phenomenon will be tackled meticulously.
In conclusion, although the world has ability to support a crowded population, people is advised to have awareness of this problem to solve themselves. I would argue that the negative effects of population density over shadow the tremendous benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | Vuong Linh | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Vuong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Vuong Linh | 61 | view |
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 56
- the best way to..... 61
- the bar graph 11
- the table show information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- Some people believe that population explosion is not a serious problem because the world has enough resources to support this issue. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...dentified that the green environment is replace by the pollution gradually because of t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48031496063 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1263511556 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0884113904 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285736443931 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731007525685 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665385251653 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160500023558 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552688321895 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.