The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The line graph compares the amounts of money (millions US dollars) people spent on books in four different countries from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, the amount of money buying books which increased in countries: Germany, France, Italy and Austria over the 10 year- period. In comparison with other countries, Germany is the only country with a noticeably higher number for spending money buying books.
The amount of paying for books in Germany was exactly 80 in 1955 before there was a slight growth to 90 in the next 4 years. However, over the period of next four years, Germany witnessed a decline, at approximately 85 in 2003. During the remainder of the period, it peaked at closely 100 in 2005. French saw a more stable increase than Germany in the amount of money spent on buying books, the figure changed from generally 55 in 1995 to around 60 in 2005.
The money for buying books in Italy didn't vary more significantly than both of the countries above. Around 55 was the figure of this country from 1999 to 2005 with the highest was 60 in the year 2005. Whereas Austria was starting lower than the rest of the countries at 30, it increased continually to 70 by the end of this period to surpass the money being spent on books in Italy.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-04 | M.A. gaber | 56 | view |
2018-07-04 | M.A. gaber | 73 | view |
2018-07-04 | M.A. gaber | 73 | view |
2018-07-04 | M.A. gaber | 73 | view |
2018-07-04 | saad_ga26@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 73
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 77
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 71
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...nd Austria over the 10 year- period. In comparison with other countries, Germany is the on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... The money for buying books in Italy didnt vary more significantly than both of co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69506726457 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45164788033 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533632286996 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7669222505 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286425862424 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104761157432 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094116741225 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177452864771 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423494854514 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.