In some countries, few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, highly paid jobs are becoming the target of many people. In some nations, a bulk amount of money is paid as salaries to few people. It is considered by many people that this is beneficial both for individuals and government. In contrast, others argue that to balance economical condition in society government take actions to control the amount earned by the people. This essay will discuss both views in detail and provide evidence that remuneration should be kept high.
One the one hand, it is argued by some people that high salaries have numerous advantages. Firstly, a high paid person works for limited hours and fulfill his all needs which means he does not have to work for extra hours. In this way, he maintains his private and social life perfectly. Secondly, it also benefits the government because they can collect more taxes from individuals to and make hospitals and other infrastructure for public. Hence, it is evident that high income helps both the employees and government.
On the other hand, some people claim that it causes unbalanced economical community. In our societies, surplus salaried people enjoy top-tier services and benefits such as health, food, education and leisure activities. On the side, people with blue collar jobs receive low incomes and strive for their basic needs. This in result, force them to indulge in illegal and criminal activities. As a result, community face problems and inequality among people. Thus, few people earning high money and others striving, initiates bad circumstances.
In conclusion, both views are explored in this essay. Such as, huge salaries give advantage to both the government and public. While unregulated income rates are dangerous to society. In my opinion, the advantages of high incomes outweigh the dis-advantages.
- Writing task 1: The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 61
- Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people thinks it is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 60
- In some countries, few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 88
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on their planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ulk amount of money is paid as salaries to few people. It is considered by many pe...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... people claim that it causes unbalanced economical community. In our societies, surplus sa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tage to both the government and public. While unregulated income rates are dangerous ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23287671233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70591291828 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3215465679 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399924561341 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100474111135 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639160877654 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220366111213 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564824715912 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.