Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Technological innovations have resulted in a tremendous change in the way people communicate with each other. This shift has also changed the dynamics of relationships amongst them.
The onset of virtual world has created a parallel world for may people. Due to better technology, there has been an increase in communication through internet platforms and phones. As a result, most of the relationships developed today are of virtual nature. For example, an employee interacting with a vendor in different country never meets him physically, but yet maintains a professional relationship via emails, calls etc. Similarly, rest of the relationships in our life are also increasingly being established in virtual world itself. Although, we still maintain physical interaction with our immediate family and friends, the rise in number of relationships developed through internet based social media platforms indicate a different picture. It points to a scenario where face-to-face interactions are being under-valued and greater importance is given to our parallel world.
This trend is considered to have both positive and negative trends. While it cannot be denied that technology has helped us to be closer by improving communication. This is a positive trend for professional sphere and also personal sphere. For e.g., business decisions can be communicated effectively through technology in any part of the world. Also family persons can be contacted easily and frequently around the globe. The time lag has been eliminated due to faster communication medium. However, on the other hand, this also means that we are never disconnected from each other. This can have severe implications, as individuals may end up with lack of personal space and time, and thus, this may affect their well-being.
In conclusion, I believe, although technology has enabled us to have better interactions in terms of quantity, it has not necessarily helped us in improving their quality. Therefore, I think this change has been more of negative development for us than positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 78
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...have both positive and negative trends. While it cannot be denied that technology has...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...gh technology in any part of the world. Also family persons can be contacted easily ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, if, may, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.475 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16646860674 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3995092563 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2105263158 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244713121829 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721077034736 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742889035073 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167436500833 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968243702863 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.