Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in Australia. The table shows the amount of dollar spent on various activities per week while the pie chart show.
The Charts illustrate how much money spent on curricular activities as well as on education in Australia from 2001 to 2003.The data calibrated in dollars.
Have a look on table chart, in initial year, 150 dollars which was spent on food while, on clothes 50 dollars smaler than utilised as compare to the former. There was a fifth dollars consumed on cosmetic and 35 dollars on entertainment. It has followed by the next couple of years 2002,2003 ,similar proportion was spending on food about 160 dollars.Difference of 3 dollars could be observed on clothes and cosmetic in two years. In 2003 and 2004 45 dollars, 40 dollars spent on entertainment.
By having a glance on pie chart , teenagers recommended 50%dollars for books however, 31% dollars which was less than the books expenditure on Internet. 18% dollars was utilised on projects whereas, membership was negligible thing.
Overall, the large proportion of used for food and more money spent on books.
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 89
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The Chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012. 78
- The diagrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 78
- Now with the help of genetic engineering parents can choose the gender and physical characteristics of child whatever they want and what are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ducation in Australia from 2001 to 2003.The data calibrated in dollars. Have a lo...
^^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'dollar'?
Suggestion: dollar
...ompare to the former. There was a fifth dollars consumed on cosmetic and 35 dollars on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed by the next couple of years 2002,2003 ,similar proportion was spending on food ...
^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Difference
... was spending on food about 160 dollars.Difference of 3 dollars could be observed on cloth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nment. By having a glance on pie chart , teenagers recommended 50%dollars for bo...
^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
...er, 31% dollars which was less than the books expenditure on Internet. 18% dollars wa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06289308176 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98642109179 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3584876263 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198429658575 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851206381666 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599685817344 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105042617191 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466132167806 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.