Give an example of an accomplished person whose success didn’t have any effect of his bad neighbourhood.
The effect of a bad neighborhood, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of a bad neighborhood has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on people’s accomplishment over the years. It can be agreed that a bad neighborhood can jeopardize a children’s future, but some people claim that success depends on other reasons. This essay will elaborate how the bad influence of a neighborhood can hamper children’s future and how Neymar managed to overcome this situation and thus will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there numerous reasons why bad neighborhood interferes with youngsters future, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that drugs usage, common in such areas, usually drives people in the wrong direction making them waste time and jeopardizing their future. For instance, research shows that 80% of people from bad areas end up having problems with drugs as an adult. Bad influence, therefore, can jeopardize people’s future.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks that can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of a bad area, but the most important one lies in the fact that with good parenting, which is the case of Neymar, children can manage to disregard bad influence, sticking to good lessons learned at home. As an illustration, Neymar who comes from a structured family grew up in a bad environment in Brazil, but despite the bad influence from the area managed to become a successful soccer player. Good parenting, hence, helps children overcome bad influence from native regions.
In the light of above discussion, it can be concluded that the impact of the bad neighborhood is prominent, although good parenting helps to overcome this problem.
- In many countries students who behave badly in class are expelled from their school and never allowed to return Many consider this an effective way to educate while others disagree Discuss both sides of the argument and share your opinion Where possible s 63
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 60
- Some people work only a few months a year and take the rest of the time off to do whatever they like To what extent the advantages of this arrangement overweigh the disadvantage 66
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 80
- Every day traffic seems to get worse on our roads. How can we reduce the number of cars on our roads today? What alternatives can we offer car drivers?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3485915493 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12663962144 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538732394366 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0190736997 50.4703680194 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.090909091 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156254185756 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717652817697 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381244790307 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899670514091 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357254659181 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.