Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations.
Working environment is very important for people to improve their skill or get promotion and achieve the top position of their career. While few masses would like to work for the only one company throughout their life.other prefer to experience the work in different companies.
Admittedly, there are several for the employ to work in one company. Firstly, it could bring several economic benefits to people. Because they are familiar with how to company operate and how the work to be done, they could easily complete their tasks. As a result, they will have a stable job as well as income. Further, masses who work for the same enterprise have a long time to practice their skills and knowledge for their job as well as they may become expert.
On the flip side,there are some demerits also for working in industry. If they do same job all the time. For instance, my uncle have worked as a assistant for big corporation for five years. However, he moved to a smaller company a year ago, and he quickly appointed to a director position with high salary. Moreover, the paradox here is that only when they transfer to another company then they would learn the different skills which can support them to make perfect themselves. To cite an example, my cousin working as a financial analysis in a finance company then migrate to a media company. As a result, his communication skills have improved also.
In conclusion, everyone have right to choose one of the two above views but they should consider which way can give them opportunity to reach the highest ladder in their career.
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue. 67
- The chart gives information on the percentage of British people give money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 56
- Some people think history has nothing or little to us but other think that styfyung past history can help us better understanding the present .discuss two views and give your opinion. 56
- Do you support that nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes 68
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organisations. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...y may become expert. On the flip side,there are some demerits also for working in i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... demerits also for working in industry. If they do same job all the time. For inst...
^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... For instance, my uncle have worked as a assistant for big corporation for five ...
^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... his communication skills have improved also. In conclusion, everyone have right ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79927007299 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51754195112 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1027084076 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369456801754 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130083112052 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120660734609 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224732862458 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131598471823 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.