The table bow gives the information about the world population snd and distribution in 1950 snd 2000 with in an estimate of the situation in 2050.
The given tabular char reveals the information about the world population and distribution by six nations In the year 1950,2000 and 2050. The information is given in billions and percentum which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that world population is given in billions in the year 1950 and 2000 was 2.5 billion and 6.0 billion and i will be 9.0 billion in the year 2050.
Apart from that, the population in Africa in the year 1950 and 2000 was 9% and 13% but in will increase in 2050 will be 20%. After that, the asia's population in the year will be 59% more than the Africa. The population of Europe in the year 1959, 2000 and in the 2050 will be 22%, 12% and 7% respectively. The population of north America in three years is less than 10% and Oceania's population is not more than 1%.
Overall, it is evident that the population of Asia is more than other countries whereas the population of Oceania is less than all the six nations.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 73
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for laerning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion on this? 56
- The daigram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the silk cloth 73
- Tje climograph below shows average monthly temperature and rainfall in the city of kolkata. 70
- Traffic growth in the Natherland since 1950 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...000 was 2.5 billion and 6.0 billion and i will be 9.0 billion in the year 2050. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50568181818 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53981085999 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0621252971 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197264440489 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107833365368 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084368243273 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135591889816 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723670509619 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.