: All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
It is generally opined that all vehicles on roads must be replaced by electric vehicles owing to a huge consumption of conventional fuels. I strongly agree with the standpoint due to its overwhelmingly positive results related to global warming and its conservation for future.
To begin with, it is inevitable that using electric traction, global warming can be curbed to a large extent. The petrol or diesel driven cars produce a huge amount of carbon content and emit many harmful gases. Therefore, the temperature levels are escalating and posing detrimental threats to the whole stratosphere. In addition, electric power driven locomotives does not contribute to the burgeoning pollution by not producing any flu gases. Hence, such alternatives are acting as a strong deterrent to decreasing quality of life perpetuated due to air pollution. Taking “Japan” as a telling example, the carbon emission was cut-down almost 58% by just prohibiting old cars and subsidizing people to get them replaced with eco-friendly substitutes such as solar power operated cars.
It is also irrefutable that the non-renewable energy sources can be preserved for future generations by adopting energy-efficient electric cars. Depleting natural resources is a thought-provoking issue, which can undoubtedly be curbed using modern electric traction systems. Electricity can be produced in hydro-electric power plans using water as the only fuel without exploiting environment and the same energy should used by cars do not engender any environmental threat. Moreover, petrol and diesel’s stock can be maintained for futuristic usage. For instance, the consumption of diesel has seen a dramatic downfall with the emergence of electric vehicles in the last decade throughout the world.
In conclusion, to save conventional fuels and environment for the sake of humanity, the only possible and most efficacious solution is to get vehicles replaced by advanced electric vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-16 | harpreetdhillon32565@gmail.com | 22 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | Vibhu Khurana | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64214046823 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31311039423 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4114869819 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218686041315 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634636102624 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576856463741 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116624524029 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346567530341 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.