Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Having a broad knowledge of everything is something which may seem essential in today's life and if we do not have at least some basic information about different topics, we probably face to some problems. In these days, which we have to handle lots of challenges and overcome all of them to have this chance to compete with others, it is necessary to know about different topics. Some people believe that we must increase our knowledge in different fields, while others disagree. In my view, it is better to be focused only on one specific field and become expert in it and I would like to elaborate my opinion with following reasons.
First, life is not that much long to learn everything about different topics. If we want to be expert in all fields, we must live for at least one hundred years and it is not like what our life is really. Nowadays we see how fast everything changes and it is impossible to adapt to the this speed if we focus on so many different fields. On the other hand, if we just put all our efforts on one specific field, we can become an expert in the field, exactly like a mirror which can burn everything, just when it focuses all lights it receives. My own experience is a compelling example of it. Some years ago, when I was a teenager, I used to think that it would be really nice to know five or six different languages and started to learn all of them at the same time. As the result, I took as many classes as I could and the final result was failing in almost all of them, why so I did not have enough time to study all of them really good and finally decided to just focus just on English and become like a fluent and native speaker in just this language.
Second, nowadays everything has became specialized. Some centuries ago, we had so many scientists who were expert in different topics and it was just because of our barely knowledge about the topics we knew about them, but today it is not like that anymore. By happening fast increase in the amount of knowledge men have about different things, every academic subjects have became specialized and each person can focus on only one or some similar and related topics and it is the thing which make becoming expert in everything impossible. As an example, when I started my academic major in food science, I decided to just focus on one topic as my research field, why so if I wanted to focus in broad range of topics, I could not do any good research in any of these fields. That was the time when I decided to narrow my path in science and it was also the thing which helped me a lot to find a supervisor for my PhD degree too.
To cut the long story short, I would like to say that I disagree with this opinion that we must be expert in so many fields and have broad knowledge of many academic subjects, why so it is not possible in real life. As the result, my conviction is that it is better to focus all our energy and effort on one subject and work on it in the best possible way. why so, being a master and expert in one subject is much better than being a jack of all trades and master of none.
- advantages and disadvantages of buying franchise 73
- smoking 90
- the things we learn from friends are more important than the things we learn from family 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- agree or not? the negative effects of televisions shows and movies on young people are more than their positive effects 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...hanges and it is impossible to adapt to the this speed if we focus on so many different ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...apt to the this speed if we focus on so many different fields. On the other hand, if we just p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...age. Second, nowadays everything has became specialized. Some centuries ago, we had...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...nt things, every academic subjects have became specialized and each person can focus o...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Why
...nd work on it in the best possible way. why so, being a master and expert in one su...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, really, second, so, while, at least, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 587.0 407.700716846 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29131175468 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33374202071 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407155025554 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 821.7 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8862680465 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.578947368 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8947368421 20.6045352989 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165315913151 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567072232027 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502602143132 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124802278707 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565478956422 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.