The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The given circular representations illustrate the information about the quality of water which is being used by 6 areas: north America, south America, europe, africa, central Asia and south East Asia for 3 different purposes. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is evident that peak quantity of water has been used for agricultural purpose by 4 areas: south America, africa, central Asia and south east asia, but not in the case of North America and Europe.
It can be seen that, for industrial use, Europe use highest quantity of water which is 53%, following with 48% by north America. In addition to this, 10% of water have been used by south America for industrial use. Moreover, quantity of water is being used by 3 areas: North America, south America and Europe for domestic use is 13%, 19% and 15% respectively.
Moving further, not only central Asia but also south East Asia have been using 7% of water for domestic use. Apart from this, neither Africa nor central Asia is being water above than 10% for industrial use. Further more, quantity of water have been used by Africa, central Asia and south East Asia for agricultural is 84%, 88% and 81% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-28 | Rajan wahla | 61 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 67
- The diagrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 73
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on the holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages. 73
- These days young children spend a lot of time using computer, tablets and smartphones phones. Some people think that introducing children to technology at a young age is beneficial. Other believe that they would no benefits from introducing the children t 73
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'use the highest'.
Suggestion: use the highest
...e seen that, for industrial use, Europe use highest quantity of water which is 53%, followi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90476190476 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56208177827 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2626558595 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203963893221 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121993020112 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488128679277 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145635400272 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372710897658 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.