The graph below compares figures for productions and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 . It also predicts the figures of 2025 .
The given line graph depicts the production and consumption of energy in US from 1950to 2000 . It also predicts the figures of 2050 . Overall, in 2025 the US will consume a more energy and will produce less energy. To commence with, in 1950 the US were using and producing the similar energy units as 25 . Then , in 1975 the value was. Increasing and the US were again same level producing and consuming 65 units of energy.however , it start inclining in a fluctuation way. In 2000,they were producing almost 60 units of energy. Moreover, the US consumed 100 units of energy by 2000 . And 40 units of energy were imported by US . On the other hand, in future US will produce 80 units of energy. Furthermore, the consumption of energy will high units . The US will consume 140 units of energy. And US will project 60 units of energy. In conclusion, in 1995 the US were consuming and producing the similar units of energy . But in 2025 productions of energy units will less and will more consumed by US .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-24 | Ramandeep1996 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...umption of energy in US from 1950to 2000 . It also predicts the figures of 2050 . ...
^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...0 . It also predicts the figures of 2050 . Overall, in 2025 the US will consume a ...
^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re energy and will produce less energy. To commence with, in 1950 the US were us...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...producing the similar energy units as 25 . Then , in 1975 the value was. Increasin...
^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng the similar energy units as 25 . Then , in 1975 the value was. Increasing and t...
^^
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and consuming 65 units of energy.however , it start inclining in a fluctuation way...
^^
Line 1, column 631, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... US consumed 100 units of energy by 2000 . And 40 units of energy were imported by...
^^
Line 1, column 676, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d 40 units of energy were imported by US . On the other hand, in futur...
^^
Line 1, column 679, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 units of energy were imported by US . On the other hand, in future US will pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 810, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he consumption of energy will high units . The US will consume 140 units of energy...
^^
Line 1, column 895, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...And US will project 60 units of energy. In conclusion, in 1995 the US were consu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1047, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd producing the similar units of energy . But in 2025 productions of energy units...
^^
Line 1, column 1128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s will less and will more consumed by US .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57865168539 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62342992343 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443820224719 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9138356774 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 54.3333333333 112.824112599 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8666666667 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248133995505 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116193721493 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963754530271 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248133995505 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.1 13.2329268293 46% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.23 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.4 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.