The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period.
The depicted bar chart provides us with some statistical information about rates of graduate employment by gender, aged 20-24, in a particular European country. It is clearly seen that in October 2009, the number of both male and female unemployed graduates reached a peak at 22% and 14%, respectively.
Analyzing the chart more carefully it can be revealed that on the premise of the given period the percentage of unemployed rate was only 10% and 8%, accordingly which was followed by a slight decrease over two quarters. In October 2008, it increased significantly although the recovery was short-lived.
Referring to the graph, in the next two quarters the percentage of male unemployed graduates remained stable at just over 11%. Simultaneously, the pattern for female counterparts was different which showed a slight decrease to 2%. In July 2009, unemployment rate of male graduates fell down but the trend was the complete reverse when it comes to the other gender it grew more than 5 times.
To sum it up, over the period as a whole, the percentage of unemployment rates for men surpasses female ones.
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults 78
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions.Some people think it is fully justified while others think it is unfair. 80
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 71
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period. 67
- The table gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 184 200
No. of Characters: 898 1000
No. of Different Words: 115 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.683 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.88 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.959 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.906 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.403 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.692 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.008 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4