The line chart above shows changes in the average money spent every+ month on children’s sports by parents from 2008 to 2010. The following graph compares the number of children taking part in three different physical activities, which are football, athletics and swimming in the exact period.
It is clear that the medium of exchange spent on sports rises rather consistently. On the other hand, there were significant changes in the number of children participating in the three sport in 6-year period.
In 2008, there were only about 500 children doing athletics, almost tripled by the number of those went for swimming, and the number of children choosing football was roughly 8 million. Contemporarily, the average funding for sports monthly was 20 pounds. In the next two years, the number of children participating in football and athletics remained relatively stable. However, the swimming figure saw a slight rise with 2.5 million children in 2010. Still, the amount of money spent every month was still rising steadily.
In the last four year of the period, both the amount of money spent on sports and the number of children taking part in swimming still showed sign of steady rise, reaching their highest of around 4 million children and 32 pounds. At the same time, statistics of children participating in athletics experienced a sudden rise from 2010 to 2012, peaked at 5 million, before dropped slightly in the next two years to approximately 4.5. As for the number of children taking part in football, continued to show steady rise to almost 8 million in 2014.
The line chart above shows changes in the average money spent every+ month on children’s sports by parents from 2008 to 2010. The following graph compares the number of children taking part in three different physical activities, which are football, athletics and swimming in the exact period.
It is clear that the medium of exchange spent on sports rises rather consistently. On the other hand, there were significant changes in the number of children participating in the three sport in 6-year period.
In 2008, there were only about 500 children doing athletics, almost tripled by the number of those went for swimming, and the number of children choosing football was roughly 8 million. Contemporarily, the average funding for sports monthly was 20 pounds. In the next two years, the number of children participating in football and athletics remained relatively stable. However, the swimming figure saw a slight rise with 2.5 million children in 2010. Still, the amount of money spent every month was still rising steadily.
In the last four year of the period, both the amount of money spent on sports and the number of children taking part in swimming still showed sign of steady rise, reaching their highest of around 4 million children and 32 pounds. At the same time, statistics of children participating in athletics experienced a sudden rise from 2010 to 2012, peaked at 5 million, before dropped slightly in the next two years to approximately 4.5. As for the number of children taking part in football, continued to show steady rise to almost 8 million in 2014.
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
- The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar 78
- The line chart above compares the difference in the consumption of the four types of boneless meat of four different species per capita.It is clear that there were significant changes in the choice of meat in the US from 1955 to 2012. In general, beef and 78
- The line chart above demonstrates the average number of people travelling long distances to work by car of public transports, bus and train in particular, in the UK from 1970 to 2030.It is clear that there were and will be significant changes in the numbe 73
- The line graph above illustrates variations in the average prices of food and oil on a global scale in 11 years from 2000 to 2011.Overall, there’re striking similarities in the way two values change through over one decade, which show the clearest diff 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart above shows changes in the average mone...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06870229008 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7048253299 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526717557252 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1752114466 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513202964396 0.215688989381 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204668063742 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170188111233 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377423933283 0.15604864568 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.284676717955 0.0819641961636 347% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.