It's generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Most people think that for someone to be a successful artist or athlete, they must have an inborn ability to be that good. Whereas, others feel that any child can be trained to be a successful artist or sport person. This essay will look at both sides. However, in my opinion, talent is the most important attribute of any great sports person or artist.
To begin, those who feel any child can be trained to be a good artist or sports person feel so because they believe in training from a tender age. At a young age, a child can master almost anything because their brain is raw, like a new computer. Thus, they can pick up new things faster than adults. For example, a popular footballer of our generation showed no football skill as a child but, he was enrolled in a football academy where he learned all that he knows now.
On the other hand, talent is an inborn trait that someone exhibits at a young age. It shows where anyone will be likely to excel or be good at. For any athlete or artist to be extremely good, they must have had the talent, which is like a foundation to build on. Thus, a child who has no talent in a particular field can never be really good no matter how much he or she is being taught. For instance, a child who does not have a good voice or an ability to sing cannot become a superb musician, since there is no template to build on.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate that although a child's brain can be receptive to new skills, talent still plays a major role in determining how great an artist or athlete can become.
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment, we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this.What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to 67
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment, we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this.What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to 67
- Some people feel that entertainers such as filmt stars, pop music and or sport stars are paid too much moneyDo you agree or disagree 11
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment, we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this.What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to 67
- Most people believe that stricter punishments should be given for traffic offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
Comments
this is not good enough
this is not good enough
this is not good enough
this is not good enough
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...e most important attribute of any great sports person or artist. To begin, those w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, really, so, still, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32653061224 5.12529762239 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27611769038 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7431818169 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8571428571 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347934614368 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133762745724 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105222820332 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228363618586 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814590962033 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 12.4159519038 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.