Rembrandt's painting
Both lecture and passage discuss a specific painting, including portrait of a woman's face, attributed to Rembrandt, the most famous painters during seventeenth century. The passage talk about some properties of this painting considered as evidences showing this cannot be Rembrandt's work. In the opposite, even though the professor prove the properties mentioned in the passage, but she states that those justify truth of thinking about this painting done by Rembrandt. She explains the connection between these properties and the work of Rembrandt.
Firstly, both of lecture and passage state that the dressing way of woman in the portrait is unusual without proper details. The professor claims that the x-ray examination of painting pigment shows that some new color have covered the origin paint several years after the time when painting had done. This examination shows that someone made the cloth of woman portrayed in painting, unusual maybe in order to increase the value of it. In fact in the origin painting the cloth is common with considering all details.
Secondly, the passage there are some contrasts related to light and its following shadow that cannot be made such wring by Rembrandt. Oppositely, the professor mention the removing of simple color of the painting and destroy the origin shadow of painting. She states that in the origin one, every things related to light and shadows were correct.
The passage says that the panel on which the painting was painted, made by several pieces of wood glued together in the opposite of Rembrandt's painting painted on a single woody panel. The lecture asserts that the original painting was painted on a single wood which is the same with those tree used by Rembrandt to paint almost.
In sum, the passage use the properties found on paint to illustrate that this specific painting cannot be belong to Rembrandt, in contrast, the professor states that more exact examinations show that the original painting is exact like the Rembrandt's work and attributing this to Rembrandt is true.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-16 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- declining of population of sea otters 80
- the workers have to cope with whether various types of tasks or similar tasks 73
- is it significant to be known about events happening all around the world? 73
- book aren't need any more 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthy eating habits. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16816816817 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55489029145 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483483483483 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2546903831 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368422058213 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143536671061 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113525347387 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239966184089 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106067543896 0.0443174109184 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.