summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In the set of materials, the reading part explain a type of sound that Russia military detect in North Atlantic and they can't detect the source of quackers and illustrate some theories and the listening section refute the information presented in the passage, and, argues that the theories, which introduce in reading section, cannot be dependable then introduce his reasons.
first, the passage posits that the source of this sound is ocera whales where life. However, the lecture makes the point that sounds have been detected by military services can't belong to whales because these whales live surface of the ocean while these sounds come deep of the ocean.
the second according to the test, the writer claims that these sound maybe belong giant squid and s\he introduced some reasons for her or his claim. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that giant squim leave there ten years before these sounds have been detected, therefore reading section is wrong.
third, the article claims that maybe these sound source belongs to other countries technology. on the contrary, points out that, there is no doubt that these sounds haven't technological source because humans haven't these kind o weapons.
in conclusion, the talk bolsters, the motion piece of information in the past
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage? 66
- some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. do you think this is a good a idea? 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...itary detect in North Atlantic and they cant detect the source of quackers and illus...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...dependable then introduce his reasons. first, the passage posits that the source of ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...have been detected by military services cant belong to whales because these whales l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e these sounds come deep of the ocean. the second according to the test, the write...
^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...uced some reasons for her or his claim. the speaker disagrees with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...d, therefore reading section is wrong. third, the article claims that maybe these so...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ybe these sound source belongs to other countries technology. on the contrary, points out...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... belongs to other countries technology. on the contrary, points out that, there is...
^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...at, there is no doubt that these sounds havent technological source because humans hav...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ent technological source because humans havent these kind o weapons. in conclusion, t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...se humans havent these kind o weapons. in conclusion, the talk bolsters, the moti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, in conclusion, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16113744076 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30062448614 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601895734597 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.5110490493 49.2860985944 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.125 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06452816374 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101197307396 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389177977509 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424495386033 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506560841312 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356532302309 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.