sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of playing sports individually or with a team and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that individually played sports can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, playing sports in a team can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, individual played sports might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental elements of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of a hit ball pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this unique phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this remarkable phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- The experience of work is more important than having a qualification? Do u agree or disagree? 11
- do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 11
- extreme sports 88
- in a cashless society, people use more credit cards. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56928838951 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2105658864 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63670411985 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8513173116 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.916666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107144363895 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038774142035 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578874309228 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615234372015 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569255967598 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.