Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree / Disagree – done
Musci learning itself is a skill building in oneself. Some people say that music learning is good for the overall development of the child while some claim that it creates disruption in the education of a child. In this essay, I am going to convey necessary arguments before jumping to conclusion.
There are myriad benefits of learning music but the most conspicuous one is, with the music not only one can cure diseases like depression but music also helps in stress relieving. In addition, with the help of music learning, the student can upsurge their deliberation and memory power too. Moreover, by learning music, one can conquer the fear of the public speaking which is vital in today’s time. For example, it is proved by a team of the doctors that music learning on daily basis, one can overcome public speaking fear.
However, there are also negative points co-exist with the above affirmative points. Firstly, musical instruments can create the health problems in our life. To illustrate this, one of the teams of researchers has proved that playing guitar & piano for the eternal time, it can create discomfort in the fingers.
To sum up, with the aforesaid opinions, music will not only promote learning but also build a secure future in the music field. In nutshell, I profoundly believe that the benefits of music far outweigh its drawbacks.
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. Discuss it. 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate (eliminate) this? 77
- Parents are legally held responsible for children's behavior. give your opinion. 77
- Whether studying films at schools is as important as studying literature? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99561403509 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59398203109 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600877192982 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4642138115 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9166666667 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155854010888 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606848599142 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447443761746 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918154343529 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468288748232 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.