The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The two given charts explain why US residents traveled and what public transportation problems they experienced in the year 2009.
Overall, the principal reason for Americans traveled was to commute to and from work, while the primary concern was the cost of traveling.
About the bar chart, with 49%, commuting to and from work was the most significant proportion in the chart. In contrast, only 6% residents traveled in term of visiting friends or relatives, while the number of social reason reached for one-tenth of total. Additionally, shopping was cited as the reason for 16% of all travel, and unspecific as "personal reasons" accounted for the remaining 19%.
Regarding the pie chart, the most and the least significant portions were pricing of travel, with 36% and spacing for pedestrians, with 6%, respectively. Moreover, there was 19% citizens worried about safety when traveling public, while nearly a half of that number, 8% people thought that access to the public transport was the main issue. The combined percentage of two remaining factors accounted for a total of 28%. In detail, the number of aggressive drivers and highway congestion issues were 17% and 14%, respectively.
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agr 86
- Multi-cutural societies, in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people, bring more benefits th drawbacks to a country. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- There is growing evidence that man made activities are making global temperatures higher What might be the man made causes of temperatures rising How should we deal with this problem 68
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes seriouspollution and uses up the world’s fuel resources. 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26701570681 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86250050798 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61780104712 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8105126871 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404580278547 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150854163706 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691009459018 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236194435093 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424082290642 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.