The given pie charts compare the primary reason for inhabitants decided to move in and out of the UK over a period of one year, 2007.
Overall, the most common reason was related to having a definite job oversea.
Firstly, there were 30% immigrants and 29% emigrants traveled and left the UK due to "Definite job" reason, which was the most significant proportion in the chart. In addition, looking for work accounted for 22% emigration figure, that of immigration was lower almost a-half, at 12%. Regarding accompany with relatives, the ratio of immigration and emigration received a resembling rate of 15% and 13% respectively. Although "Formal study" reason caused 26% people immigrating, that of emigration just accounted for 4%.
Secondly, the ratio of unstated reason in emigration was higher 3-fold compared to this reason in immigration. In detail, there was 18% people left the UK without providing the causes, while only 6% inhabitants did not mention the reason they arrived UK. Also, others explanation of immigrating and emigrating scored at 11% and 16%, respectively.
- Some cities have few control over design and construction on housing and office buildings People think that they are free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 96
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 73
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group, 1998-2000 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lated to having a definite job oversea. Firstly, there were 30% immigrants and 2...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39772727273 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03711119676 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9113771893 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138275702324 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606950604763 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430574590791 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922340785441 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476897192045 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.