The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The given table illustrates the percentage of pupils in two primary school having problems in seven educational categories, during two different years, 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the educational problems in school A experienced the contrary tendency for all kind of problems, compared to the consistent trend of school B after ten years of observation.
Firstly, regarding the data in 2005, it is clear that the problem of following instruction of people in school A possessed the largest proportion in the table, at 42%, which was 7-fold higher than that of school B. Furthermore, with just 2% lower, at 40%, the percentage of school A's children having issues in concentration in lessons became the second significant proportion observed, while the rate of pupils facing with that problem in school B only accounted for 15%. Moreover, "Verbal expression of ideas", "Listening skills" and "Spelling" problems in both schools were dramatically higher than the other issues. The combination of number of "Reading ability" and "Handwriting" problems in school A reached 50%. In contrast, that of school B only accounted for a quarter of total.
Secondly, in 2015, there were significant decreasing tendencies in all educational problems in school A, while proportions of school B remained stable. In detail, with the same percentage of 28%, the handwriting issue of school A became the most significant portion in the table, while that of school B was the most diminutive figure of only 7%. The rate of "Concentration in lessons" and "Following instructions" of school A dropped considerably to reach at the same percentage, at 18%. After ten years, the number of pupils having problem in following instructions of school B double to score at 12%, while the percentage of "concentration in lessons" problem remained unchanged. The rate of "Spelling", "Listening skills" and "Verbal expression of ideas" issues of school A versus that of school B were 25%, 20% and 21% versus 10%, 12% and 15%, respectively. With a minor raise of 1%, "Reading ability" problem in school A scored at 23%, and just 9% in school B.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation's history.However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is to maintain old buildings? 89
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students.Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 67
- Today, the majority of children are raised by their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 965.302439024 196% => OK
No of words: 342.0 196.424390244 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52339181287 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.81268274416 2.65546596893 144% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459064327485 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 283.868780488 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6089842846 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.307692308 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197373014531 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102990076335 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763451281529 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172326552695 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909304361879 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.