The given graph illustrates the rate of the unemployment in two nations, US and Japan, between 1993 to 1999.
Overall, there are a fluctuation observed in both figures during the six years, however the unemployment rate of US had a tendency to decrease over time, while that of Japan experienced increasing trend.
In 1993 the unemployment rate of Japan was 7%, approximately 3-fold compared to the rate of US. However, after a significant fluctuation around 6% in two years 1994 and 1995, the figure of US dropped to score at 5.0% in early of 1997. In contrast, the rate of Japan kept surging up from 2.5% at the beginning of 1993 to reach just under 4.5% on March 1996. Few months later, this figure dropped to below 4.0% before slightly climbing up to collide with the rate of US at 5.0% in 1998.
In the last tracking year, 1999, both of two figures hovering around 5.0% and remained stable until the end of the period.
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature 78
- Today, the majority of children are raised by their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family? 78
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 89
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation's history.However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is to maintain old buildings? 89
- Some cities have few control over design and construction on housing and office buildings People think that they are free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61818181818 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58450564354 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5570143544 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277956373945 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135607498253 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967904329134 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164206741474 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110895531357 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.