The graph below gives information from a report in 2010 about the use of energy in Australia since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The given chart illustrates the energy consumed in five types of fuel in Australia from 1980 to the projection of 2030. The unit is calculated by billion.
Overall, the nonrenewable energy sources, included Oil, Coal, Natural Gas and Nuclear possess the majority of consumption and have a more significant increasing tendencies in comparison with that of the only one renewable energy source named Solar.
Firstly, looking at the nonrenewable sources, the four types of these fuel both have the increasing trends over the period. The figure of Oil and Gas experience a fluctuation in the first thirty years, while that of Coal and Nuclear have a more consistent rising. In detail, the using of Oil, Gas and Coal are 35, 20 and 17 units, respectively in 1980. After hovering around 33 units, the consumption of Gas surges up to hit the peak at 45 units in 2010. Similarly, the number of using of Gas fluctuates around 20 units until 2000 before increasing to collide with Coal at 25 units in 2010. Moreover, after remaining steady at 5 units in the first 10 years, the figure for Nuclear rising up to double at 10 units in 2010. Due to the projection, except for Coal, the consumption of three remaining nonrenewable sources are expected to decrease in 2020 before climbing up to touch the new vertex at 50 units (Coal), 27 units (Gas) and 11 units (Nuclear) in 2030. The figure of Coal is predicted to gradually increase over the next two decades to hit the peak at 35 units in the last tracking year.
Secondly, regarding the renewable energy, the consumption of Solar slightly increases from 3 units in 1980 to 6 units in 2010, and being projected to be unchanged until 2020 before going up to touch the highest point at 8 units in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | phmixu27 | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-14 | mimeomahong | 81 | view |
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 67
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 94
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agr 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 33.7804878049 213% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70163934426 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65679800732 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485245901639 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6240280518 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.23603664747 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138454545861 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623823731702 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747004907216 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125692763818 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643728225526 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.