TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age.
The Reading and the lecture are both about the study of The United Kingdom’s old cultural artifacts, which are traces of buildings, tools, and art from the Stone Age. The author believes that scientists have dealt with serious problems and limitation in Britain. The professor brings into question the claims made in the article. He considers that the new rules address by the scientists have improved Britain’s findings in the three ways that will be discussed.
First, the author comes up with the idea that valuable artifacts were lost because of the construction projects developed in Britain cities. It is mentioned that the artifacts were destroyed and not preserved. However, the professor argues that in the past, in order to construct a building, there was an examination of the site at first and then plan something there.
Second, the author states that the financial support was inadequate. The article notes that the archeology funds and grants were not enough to develop research. Meanwhile, the professor rebuts this argument by pointing out that those projects and funding were covered by company construction, not by the government. He highlights that the company construction follows all the stags of the process.
Finally, the author contends that students are not drawn to study archeological careers because they end up in other fields without interesting jobs. The professor, on the other hand, posits that since there were a lot of discovered sites, actually there were more places for archeologists. He puts forth the idea that students now can do research by writing reports or articles. In short, the professor contradicts the reading opinion about the archeological artifacts’ treatment over the past of the years by saying giving some current examples.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 85
- It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 80
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ous problems and limitation in Britain. The professor brings into question the clai...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34035087719 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86835613425 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4167787417 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.466666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257644301622 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784957837563 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536062696346 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145377154839 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293498319316 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.