The chart below shows the amount of energy consumed in three countries in the year 2000 and the rate of increase in energy consumption a scompared with the year 1999.
The table provides information about the energy usage in three different countries (Australia, Japan and USA) in 2000 and the increase in rate as compared with the year 1999.
In general, among these three countries, USA consumes the most energy but the rate of increase as compared before is low. Japan, on the other hand, consume less energy in comparison with that of USA but it has the highest rate of usage between these countries.
To start with, USA is undoubtedly consuming the most energy as compared with the other two countries, using 1,420 million tons. This is followed by Japan and Australia at 403 and 92 million tons respectively. When it comes to the rate of how the usage climbed up, Japan apparently consumed faster that the others, having 42.5% while Australia and USA have 21.5% and 13% increase accordingly.
The energy consumption was divided into three categories namely Industry, Transport and "Others". In these areas, USA uses the most energy (Industry at 420, Transport at 565 and others at 435 million tons). Next to that is Japan using 159 in Industry, 96 in transport and 48 in others. Australia, being third on the list, consumes 36 in industry, 25 for trasnport and 31 for "others". Despiote of USA consuming most energy, it ranked third as for the increase of rate, next to Australia and Japan ranking second and first respectively.
- Computers are increasingly used in education In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which are teachers more important 77
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 33
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- The chart below shows the amount of energy consumed in three countries in the year 2000 and the rate of increase in energy consumption a scompared with the year 1999 51
- The table below shows the mothly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, first, if, second, so, third, while, as for, in general, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88080696186 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3007560744 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270331518611 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114103468141 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10713595262 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211756635209 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108536549431 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.