The graphs below show the size of the ozone hole over Antartica and the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000.
The line graphs provide information on the magnitude of the ozone hole over Antartica and production of gases that is damaging the ozone layer, namely CFC-11, CFC-12 and N2O, over the 20 year period.
Overall, the damage to ozone layer has increased considerably over time in relation to the production of harmful gases.
To be specific, it can be seen on the graph that the production of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in 1980 started of at approximately 70 million tonnes and 30 million tonnes respectively. During this time, the damage on the ozone layer is just about 400 kms. The production of CFC-11 significantly dropped to 20 million tonnes in year 1995 while the production of CFC-12 continued to increase steaduly until 50 million tonnes in year 2000. Though there is a decrease in CFC-11 production, the hole in the ozone layer became wider at 2000 kms in 1990 and started to decrease only after that to about 1,500 kms. People then begin to introdice the N2O in year 1990 and showed a steep rise in production to approximately 37 million tonnes in year 2000. Its effect is reflected on the chart when the size of the ozone hole picked up to 3,500 kms in year 2000.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in diffirent weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002 87
- The diagrams below show the problem of flooding in a UK town and two possible solutions 31
- The table below shows the mothly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67961165049 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58957720031 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0845165482 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315129042365 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152448558127 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091661451201 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255658573576 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714846475337 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.