The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world.
The bar graph illustrates the three major cause that damages the land, namely tree-cutting, breeding and farming, in four continents.
It can be seen on the graph that tree-cutting and farming are done mostly in Asia, damaging about 460 million hectares and 450 million hectares respectively. This is followed by Africa were they harm 460 million hectares of their land due to tree-cutting and 300 million hectares because of farmiung. On the other hand, less harm was done in Europe and Australia wherein the former damage 110 million hectares of their land by tree cutting and 90 million hectares of land by farmer. The latter causes 100 mmillion hectares of their land is harmed by tree cutting and approximately 600 million hectares of their land is damaged by farming.
Another cause of land damage that is provided on the chart is breeding. Africa tops the list where they harmed 500 million hectares of their land, followed by Asia, losing about 460 million hectares of lan. Australia accounts for about 210 million hectares damage from the land and Europe at 100 million hectares.
Overall, Africa and Asia causes more damage globally in contrary with Australia and Europe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-08 | nathalie | view | |
| 2021-12-08 | nathalie | view | |
| 2021-02-11 | fmichela | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- The table gives information about the female workforce and female managers in five countries 80
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in diffirent weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002 87
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK 62
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07653061224 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50810327721 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8329103188 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171492780892 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113266253992 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916853951703 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148207973181 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763063248692 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.