The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001.
The table provides information about the monthly expenses and its allocation of an average Australian household in year 1999 and 2001.
In general, the expenses of an Australian family increased insignificantly from AUD 675 in 1991 to AUD 715 only in 2001. It can also be noted that these families are considerably spending most of their money on buying and acquiring unnecessary goods and services followed by foods, while they spend the least on transportation and clothing.
To start with, during 1991, an average Australian family undoubtedly spends more money on unimportant goods and services, using AUD 250 of their budget in a month, followed by food, consuming AUD 155. These expenditure increased slightly in 2001 where they used AUD 270 and AUD 160 of their money to support these goods and services as well as their food respectively. Similarly, the spending on housing and electricity and water bills increases but not that much. The former using AUD 95 in 1991 to AUD 100 in 2001 and the latter, paying AUD 75 in 1991 to AUD 120 in 2001.
The expenditure for transportation and clothing, in contrary, remained the need that consumes less of their monthly allocation. To be specific, they spend AUD 70 on transportation and AUD 30 on clothing in 1991. Eventually, expenditure on these two items decreased in 2001, wherein they spend AUD 45 and AUD 20 accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | shayma | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | abhushek_saha | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | abhushek_saha | 78 | view |
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?. 84
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?. 73
- The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001. 84
- The table below shows the mothly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this expenditure' or 'These expenditures'?
Suggestion: This expenditure; These expenditures
...h, followed by food, consuming AUD 155. These expenditure increased slightly in 2001 where they u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ransportation and clothing, in contrary, remained the need that consumes less of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, similarly, so, well, while, in general, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00865800866 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96835884181 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6221773259 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258705573822 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118413542574 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946898663518 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192672341302 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07182600556 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.