The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001.
The presented table depicts information about how much money was spent on different types of items per month by Australian family over the period of a decade, starting from 1991 to 2001. Units are measured in dollars for each month.
At first glance, it is immediately obvious that the major proportion of money was allocated for food products, whilst that of money in terms of clothing had the smallest share throughout the survey. Moreover, there was a significant upward trend in total expenditures.
When observing the data in more detail, we can see that Australian household spending was high in 2001 than in 1991 but the difference was not significant (AUD $715 per month and AUD $675 per month respectively). The money spent on food accounted for the most considerable proportion of expenditure in 1991, which was at $155 and went up slightly to $160. The similar change was also recorded at domestic expenses, which climbed from $95 to $100. However, across this one decade, the proportion of charged money for clothing declined noticeably by one in ten to reach the point of $20.
The contribution of expenditure on electricity and water was initially almost as similar as that of transporting expenses, but while the former increased by $120, the latter experienced a marked decline to $45. Other goods and services were the second biggest items of expenditure with standing at $250 and then rose gradually by $20, reaching $270.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | shayma | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | abhushek_saha | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | abhushek_saha | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 78
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada. 11
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97083333333 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83779061165 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620833333333 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9084966709 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165826970712 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601195469011 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731813109338 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102969775314 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890374410732 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.