Nowadays, large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops. Is this a negative or positive development?
It is true that, escalating numbers of big shopping complexes and supermarket rather than small shops. However, in this essay explain about the adverse effects of such developments like, excessive tax and services, unemployment, poverty and so on. Although, there have been many advantageous in daily lives which may lead to negative trends in society and local community as well.
Tax and levy has been escalating by the entry of huge shopping centers and supermarkets. In other words, shops are occupying rental charges and other service payment in terms of inflating items prize, and service tax. For example, its often get same products at different or comparatively cheapest rate from small shops. Moreover, many biggest shopping malls often sale branded materials or products which is not affordable to many. In fact, most of the main brand things may charged for higher tax more than the value of products in hypermarkets. In addition, such big shops would lead to capitalization of certain entrepreneurs only.
Many paddler shops and small stores have mesmerizing items which is devoid by shopping complexes. In brief, local and common people sale products which have cultural values like homemade agricultural products, and cloths and so on. Most of the small shop owners employments might be diminish by the impact of supermarket. People who prefer to choose livelihood by such small shops may deduct the marketing and commerce would lead to poverty in some extent. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, many small shop keepers loss their job by the arrival of metro shopping complex in Riyadh.
To sum up, development of shopping complex and supermarkets may inhibit the time of selection in multiple shops. The detrimental effect like, extra payment of miscellaneous services and mitigating small shop owners livelihood to the core.
- Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both view and give opinion 84
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 74
- Grange park in 1920and today 78
- In most of the societies the role of mother and father differs What are the causes of this difference What will be the parental roles in future 56
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'comparatively the cheapest'.
Suggestion: comparatively the cheapest
...often get same products at different or comparatively cheapest rate from small shops. Moreover, many b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dable to many. In fact, most of the main brand things may charged for higher tax ...
^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ig shops would lead to capitalization of certain entrepreneurs only. Many padd...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all shop owners livelihood to the core.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in brief, in fact, in other words, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28911564626 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77981900104 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.5328931939 49.4020404114 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292437112575 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092191031582 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514965101605 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179862403773 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326876589834 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.