Is it effective to learn online as to learn face to face with a teacher?
Humans are becoming slaves of technology and its advancement day by day as it has become an essential part of our lives to fulfill our necessities. Even for our educational requirements, it has become a dire need for the dissemination of knowledge. In my opinion, learning online or learning in the presence of a teacher both has its advantages and disadvantages which I am going to discuss in this essay.
Teaching in a classroom by a teacher has always been proved an effective method for the transfer of knowledge worldwide. Students gather around on one place and the teacher having the expertise in a particular subject is determined to share his/her ideas, views and opinion. The basic things that matters in a classroom is the facial expression and body language of the teacher which intimates the students to grasp the concepts whatever he/she is trying to explain. Secondly, group interactions would make learning better with visual aids being provided. The interest of a particular student is reflected with the presence of teacher physically in a classroom.
On the contrary, online teaching is replacing the traditional method of teaching. Online teaching is effective in the sense that it saves time, and stamina of the students who spends hours for commutation. This method keeps students fresh and more focused on their learning. But on the darker side, face to face interaction and peer learning is missing in this type of learning which are major drawbacks of online teaching.
I would end up giving my opinion that although online teaching has many benefits but the traditional method is more effective for the process of learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-04 | Huma Mohiuddin | 73 | view |
- Fewer and fewer young people are choosing to become teachers. Why do young people not want to be teachers? How this could be changed? 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- You have seen an advertisement in an English newspaper for a job working in the City Museum shop during the holidays. You decide to apply for the job.Write a letter to the director of the Museum. In your letter,•introduce yourself•explain what experie 73
- You are looking for a part-time job at a football club.Write a letter to the manager of the football club. In your letter,•introduce yourself•explain what experience and special skills you have•tell him/her when you think you could start 73
- In some developing countries it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural area in developin 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... group interactions would make learning better with visual aids being provided. The in...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... effective for the process of learning.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, secondly, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10661764706 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88516285229 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5929842051 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329606833965 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10065665137 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114046454497 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168600346625 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854879895616 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.