Do you think a cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
The importance of cashless society, was always debatable, has now been controversial. The substantial influence of cashless society has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. It can be said that credit cards give various advantages as well as disadvantages. This essay elaborates, how cards provide convenience for consumers and how it tempting buyers to purchase unnecessary products and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are number of reasons why the cashless society is important, but the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that it provides more convenience for consumers and less hassel for them as they do not need to carry cash. For instance, the recent study conducted by Australian government recorded that there is a 75% usage of credit cards during 2017. Hence, it can be said that people are now moving to using credit cards as it provides more convenience.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks which certainly overwhelm the potential impact of using cards, but the most alarming one is rooting from the fact that it may lead to unnecessary purchasing patterns. For instance, recent study on household expenditure reveals that there is a 45% unwanted purchases made during shoping as they do not want to pay for those goods instantly. Hence, it can be said that due to postponing nature of card purchases, people tempt to buy unwanted products.
After analysing the above, it can be concluded that the cashless society is prominent, although the unnecessary purchase patterns should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | manpreet9999 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | silky | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | English time | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | shruti. | 55 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20622568093 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90073058285 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0540396207 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.636363636 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108356754452 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416605680756 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452259281108 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070674702465 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289746814001 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.