The graph below shows the difference in wheat export over three different areas in 1985 to 1990.
The supplied linear chart exhibits that information about the wheat export by the Australia, Canada and European community during the 1985 to 1990.
Overall, it can be incurred that the Canada before experience the major variations it was reached at the same proportion while the European export was increase and the Australia export was decreased.
Primarily, it is vividly apparent that wheat export in the 1985 in Canada, it accorded at 19 million tonnes. After, experience minor dip, in 1986 it went up dramatically and peak up high it noticed at 25 million tonnes. Whereas, it plunged down steadily and it recorded at 14 million tonnes then, it recovered at the same ratio where it was started.
Similarly, it can be observed that the trend of Australia and European opposite with each other. In the foremost case, during the first years 1985 and 1986 the European export fall down slightly 16 to 14 millions. However, it picks up and constant in the next two years. During, the later years, it inclined suddenly and it noticed the highest rate in the 1990, it recorded at above 20 million tones. Whereas, in the latter case the Australia export had grown steadily in 1985 and in before increased in the 1987 it was declined in 1986 then, it reduces continuously and it accorded at nearby 10 millions.
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat export over three different areas. 11
- in the past when students did a unversity degree they tended to study in their own country. nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this development. 61
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat export over three different areas. 11
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat export over three different areas. 11
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat exports over three different areas. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, similarly, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54850896784 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513392857143 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.704098164 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113480788992 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516262060231 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549255726076 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859425719502 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450442794834 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.