It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space
exploration.
Space travel seems to be a charming dream for some fanatic space fans. And actually some countries on earth are spending an extremely large amount of money on space exploration due to various reasons. Therefore, it's natural to discuss whether such investment is worth or not. From my standpoint, the fund used for space travel or space exploration is totally a waste of money, and the examples and details below can support my opinion.
Admittedly, some people may insist on the fact that due to server environmental problems such as the depletion of energy storage, significant climate change and atmosphere pollution, our only home - the earth is becoming increasingly unsuitable for human to live. Consequently, it is extremely urgent for humankind to find an alternative planet to dwell and pass down our civilization. Such statements seem very plausible at first glance, more considerations, however, should be taken into account, especially when dealing with such a wealth of money.
This first key weakness of investing government fund in space project is that it requires too much but its chance to succeed is limited as well. Specifically, it costs a great deal money and efforts for a government to launch even a single spacecraft to the space. And resulting from the limitation of current level of technology, it is highly possible to lose instead of paying off. For instance, although China has become one of the most powerful countries with state-of-the-art astronomical technologies, it still fails in the last two spacecraft launch. Therefore, such great investment on a indecisive project should be carefully measured concerning its inputs and outputs.
Moreover, except the concern of its cost, another reason why I support it is a waste of money is that there are more pressing issues that also needs attention and funding supports. For the first stage, some countries, especially undeveloped countries, are facing a crisis of starvation. Therefore, spending money primarily on tackling the food shortage crisis might be a more practical and urgent action. Also, the money could be harnessed to improve the industry so as to stimulus the economy, which would definitely raise people's living standards greatly. Consequently, because governmental fund has other more pressing and pragmatic uses, it is unnecessary to spend it on space travel or space exploration.
In conclusion, government should not fund space projects because they are unrealistic and far-reaching. Perhaps the money saved could be used in other areas that are in significant need, like agriculture and industrialization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | cathylin36 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | hamiddelbari | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | negar.sh | 76 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | persepolistmm | 70 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | SHAHRIYAR | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree this statement: To solve the problems of present and the future, people should review the past. 60
- The food people ate in the past was healthier than the food people eat today 90
- It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or spaceexploration. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important tomake friends with people who can have fun with us than to make friends with people who canhelp us when we are in need. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ch. Therefore, such great investment on a indecisive project should be carefully ...
^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ured concerning its inputs and outputs. Moreover, except the concern of its cost...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 465, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ld be harnessed to improve the industry so as to stimulus the economy, which would defin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36165048544 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07121263131 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575242718447 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.863781211 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.263157895 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338202594192 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098706272199 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920077349818 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185984876778 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850600882043 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.