Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Being one of most proliferated known environmental issue, the saving land for endangered animals is a more preference subject compared with the usage of land for human needs such as farming, housing and industrial activities. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the human life is tightly associated with the life of other animals. As current environmental findings subscribe, any damage behavior in the environmental ecosystem might be harmful for all members of a ecosystem, particularly humans. Thus, the priority to sustain the environment can be implied as a critical issue. As everyone presumably knows, animals are inseparable part of environmental ecosystem and any activity to jeopardize their life should be restricted. Therefore, the use of land for human needs can be implied as one of the dangerous and the irregular behavior. In this condition, to my best knowledge, the priority of the government toward saving land for endangered animals implies as a vital subject.
Another primary reason of saving land for endangered animals can be contributed to ethical viewpoints. As prehistoric excavated evidences prove, the exploitation of humans from their surrounded environment is always in conjunction with manipulation in the ecosystem's life of other creatures. As a results, in most case, the main cause of animals extinction is strongly attributed to humans' activities. There were a lot of wild animals in different area that were eliminated by abundant hunting. Considering this fact, the necessity to allow other living things life cannot be neglected.
Aside from the point I made above, it is worth nothing that saving the land for endangered animals can bring about the huge economic interest. Regarding the importance of tourist industry, the saved land for endangered animals can attract a lot of people around the world. As current economic reports reveal, there are lots of investment to develop area for the tourist attraction by visiting endangered animals.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more that the saving land for endangered animals is one of human's priority compared with other usage of lands, with regarding the importance of sustaining ecosystem cycle, ethic issues and tourist attraction. Although, the saving land can be implied as low beneficial subject, in long term investment in addition to other necessities, the initial investment will be compensated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 66
- Holidays honor people or events. If you could create a new holiday, what person or event would it honor and how would you want people to celebrate it? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tem might be harmful for all members of a ecosystem, particularly humans. Thus, t...
^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ecosystems'' or 'ecosystem's'?
Suggestion: ecosystems'; ecosystem's
...in conjunction with manipulation in the ecosystems life of other creatures. As a results, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
... ecosystems life of other creatures. As a results, in most case, the main cause of animal...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...ct, the necessity to allow other living things life cannot be neglected. Aside fro...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...action by visiting endangered animals. Taking all these perspectives into accou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46529562982 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02560319401 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498714652956 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1757053839 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254546013551 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898387815024 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724861945546 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16702144596 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490568521621 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.