The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of residents in the USA who often went to fast food restaurants for over 10 years. These people are divided into six categories (every day, several times a week, once a week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, and never)
Overall, a majority of people ate in fast food hotels once a week, or one or twice a month. On the other hand, very least percentage of people went to restaurants every day, or never went to a restaurant in the given time period.
In case of the people who went to a restaurant once a week, the highest percentage was 33 in 2006. On the contrary, Americans who ate once or twice a month, the highest amount was near about 33% in 2013.
Americans who never went to a restaurant or every day, the percentage was less than 5% from 2003 to 2013.
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The graph below shows four categories of citrus fruits and the top three countries to which these were exported in 2012 75
- Some say that people living in high-rise apartments are lonely and unhappy, while others say that it’s advantageous to stay in high-rise apartments. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people believe that governments in developing countries can best improve people's quality of life by introducing new technology. Others, however, believe that the best way to make life better is to provide free education for all.Discuss both of view 73
- The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 664.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.31168831169 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44766437388 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474025974026 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2749647563 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224191674156 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120266209846 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043598878089 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147193634446 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372429960901 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.