Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often argued that, the variety of innovative technology makes a lapse between the people and discrimination in high class and lower class. However, others opposing and depicts, such development mitigate the gap and people could considered as in unite in all category. Although, the both arguments are reasonable, in my opinion, the ingenious development in technical side would enhance the relation and inhibit communication and financial variation to some extent.
On the one hand, the matter of rich and poor difference by the impact of technology would be declined by the terms of social connection and pop across spread of news. In other words, people are progressed technologically in higher level irrespective of the income level. Such as, in modern world most of the people has the account in any of the social sites or media groups. Such advances, may help to deal with all the person who is engaged in such groups would get plenty of knowledge regarding the every day changes in life indifferent to the priority. For instance, in Kerala, catastrophic effect of inundation and natural hazards may resolved by the influence of social groups and ingenious technological advances in people with all standards of persons.
On the other hand, some may oppose to the fact that, such technical advancement may change the way life standard and people who wish to expose their status by the novel artificial techniques. In brief, the expensive devices like smartphones, computers, body fitness equipment and CC TV cameras exposure would apparently showing the financial level of oneself. Furthermore,People who has enough money for well being may have the extreme interest to limit their connection with others. At once, they often thinks, such technological progress would be the first preference and they could help the owner more than human. However, For example, recent news report from BBC that, the elder retired couples who isolated them selves and automatic control of technology like fitness level, online live views with children. While, they undergone a cardiac attack and even neighbours have not get connect with them until their demise.
To conclude, information technology has inevitable persuade over the people mind and attitudes and may increase the financial diversity. Nevertheless, in my perspective, such discoveries often flourish the inter personal connection and relation ship without seem to be rich and poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | fhu | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Harpreet Singh Kooner | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | smiles | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Muhammed_10 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
- Many individuals prefer to talk online with their peers than going with individuals in surrounding networks do you think the benefis exceed the odds 61
- Directors of large companies receive much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it s necessary but others holds it is unfair Discuss both perspectives and give your opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai 61
- many people think that countries should produce food for all population eats and import food as little as possible to what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.] 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
...pment mitigate the gap and people could considered as in unite in all category. Although, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'the everyday'?
Suggestion: the everyday
...would get plenty of knowledge regarding the every day changes in life indifferent to the prio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 321, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'show'
Suggestion: show
...CC TV cameras exposure would apparently showing the financial level of oneself. Further...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , People
... financial level of oneself. Furthermore,People who has enough money for well being may...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 713, Rule ID: THEM_SELVES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'themselves'?
Suggestion: themselves
... the elder retired couples who isolated them selves and automatic control of technology lik...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 826, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'underwent'?
Suggestion: underwent
...e live views with children. While, they undergone a cardiac attack and even neighbours ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 882, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...iac attack and even neighbours have not get connect with them until their demise. ...
^^^
Line 8, column 203, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ective, such discoveries often flourish the inter personal connection and relation ship w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in brief, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31958762887 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87309526011 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579896907216 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4755041037 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187683884746 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063315777056 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420730993593 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124431060294 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355387355479 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.