The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart and table reveal information about Japan's population between 1950 and 2055. While the table illustrates the number of residents who are over 65s, bar chart presents total population.
According to the bar chart, the figures for inhabitants, which was 84.1 in1950, noticeably rose over the period shown before it peaked at 127.8 in 2005. As the graph says, the number of people who live in Japan will decline to 89.9 bt the time of 2055 after this increase.
For people over 65s, the amount was 4.1 million in 1950 and accounted for 4.9% of the total. This figure will rise to 37.2 until 2035, which will contribute to 34% of all people, and then will fall back by around 1 million but it is going to take 41% of the population.
In conclusion, As the graph and chart tell, although, in the future, the population will decline, the number of old people over 65s will increase in Japan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-24 | paramveersingh | 11 | view |
| 2021-05-03 | Luc1Ferrr | 84 | view |
- Air pollution 89
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
- The graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6125 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35464965547 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2970902841 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141938628722 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082423650489 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103629125378 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100376074362 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860948670453 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.