Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Univerties are open for students to define courses within the fields they are interested sure does sound alluring.
However, requires a deeper thought towards the negetive consequences it prevails with it.
Though, the applicants or as we call them youn adults are considered independant and cognizant enough to choose what is best from them. However, we cannot generalize that fact give room for students to explore there interests while studying.
A recent survey conducted in Indian collages had confounding take aways, more than 45% of the undergrad students had no idea of what they wanted to become.
This custom curriculam is producing only 'functional' graduates with only limited understanding of a particular domain oblivious about the pragmatic knowledge to articulate any other terrestrial issues. This does not mean that we expect an engineer to be able to perform a complicated heart transplant, but the intent to be able to bifuracate any issue at hand and articulate it analytically.
Moreover, we need to be able to put credance in how students define what they are interested in : is a field difficult to comperehand or easy to persue? With the advert of social media in our lives the millenails are naturally primed to purse something thrilling, out of the box, unconvential. That in itself creates a damp in the market with no weightage given to utilitarain aspects.
In the current curriculam the idea of electives is to enable to students to choose the subjects; learn; understand the subject from a field they are interested in with out laying any hinderence to the core/ essentials knowledge basis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | _sejaldangi_ | 83 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Honey for Money | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | actwig | 66 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 33
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 33
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 164, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...ect from a field they are interested in with out laying any hinderence to the core/ esse...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18939393939 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93491763854 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4784282379 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.545454545 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144060455721 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542051924197 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572387079952 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724193527991 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522289390455 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.