In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in a contemporary, sophisticated society we live in, successful occupation is assumed to have an increasingly essential role in an individual's life. There is a substantial number of people who are of the opinion that finding a lucrative career was much more comfortable in the past than in nowadays. While there are those who believe that today's society provides an appropriate opportunity for people to have a successful vocation. I personally concur with the latter group's idea. There are several reasons to support my standpoint. The most important ones of which will be elaborated upon below.
One imperative reason coming to mind at first is that in present day's society, we have many leadership coaches and work counselors who can help people to run a profitable business. These leaders are so professional in their field which leads people to find their suitable type of work and assist them to become accomplished in their way. My brother's experience is a compelling example of this. When he graduated from university five years ago, he did not know which job to follow. Fortunately, one of my father's friend is a leadership coach who studied at Oxford University. My brother decided to take advantage of his knowledge. He was such a professional counselor in his work. Thanks to his advice and instructions, my brother found his way and ran a business. Now, he becomes a prominent member of the market in his field.
The second interesting point which deserves some words here is that the advancement in technology paves the way for every job seeker to introduce their new firm to everybody. Thus, regardless of the type of your work, you will undoubtedly improve in your vocation since you will grab the attention of market by means of advertising in the social networks. According to a nationwide study that has been published in the Times Magazine, the majority of the successful companies have their own website and Instagram page which definitely help them to increase their customer's number. This approach is one of the most effective strategies by which they can introduce their work to people in global scale and attracts the attention of customers as soon as possible.
To make a long story short, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration, one can safely assume that in today's community improvement in career become much more accessible since not only can people consult with coaches and leaders who have relevant knowledge in expanding the business but also the virtual networks and the internet provide opportunity to draw attention of customers regardless of the work type.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
2019-12-04 | raniamekhaiel | 70 | view |
2019-11-14 | M.S 2019 | 70 | view |
2019-10-29 | minghui | 76 | view |
2019-10-25 | Aska | 60 | view |
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ve an increasingly essential role in an individuals life. There is a substantial number of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
... much more comfortable in the past than in nowadays. While there are those who believe that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
... While there are those who believe that todays society provides an appropriate opportu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...ing to mind at first is that in present days society, we have many leadership coache...
^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
.... To make a long story short, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06636155606 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91154300464 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562929061785 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.3940930498 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.85 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101407111572 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305591873476 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321396674127 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591922602013 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022454812116 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.