Getting a job in which you work with other people are better than getting a job in which you work alone.
There is a substantial number of people who are of the opinion that getting a job in which you work with other people is better than getting a job that you work alone and I personally concur with their opinion. I mention two interesting points here to support my agreement.
To begin with, the most important reason is work with others causes to do the job efficiently. It means the speed is faster than someone works alone. Also, working in group increases returns because everyone has some skills which he/she is proficient in. When they are working together each one undertake the specific part of the job and concentrate on. Therefore, at the end the whole job is done in the best way. Meanwhile, if there is a weakness in some parts, it is not seen and the others' job can cover these faults. For this reason, I agree with the idea that working with others is better than working alone.
The other reason can be mentioned is when people work in a group, they can strengthen their ability by learning from each other. The group working makes a chance for all to collaborate with and gain skills from each other. I remember when I worked in work group; one was responsible for typing because she was short hand typist. The other was responsible for gathering data and I represented the presentation. On that time I learned how to interview to collect related data and also how to type it fast.
In sum, working with others has a lot of benefits either for participants or final job. People can learn from each other and help themselves to offer great performance. On the other hand the result of working alone even skillful person manage it, is not comparable with group working that is why I agree with working in a group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | farzaddanaei | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-08 | Mehrnaz | 70 | view |
| 2018-10-06 | yassaman | 60 | view |
| 2017-07-17 | thanhhsgs30 | 83 | view |
- TPO 53-Integrated Writing-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 49 Integerated writing 85
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 60
- schools should teach students about specific careers and jobs instead of general subjects 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...rtant reason is work with others causes to do the job efficiently. It means the speed...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, therefore, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59677419355 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46815514145 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5866275418 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8235294118 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517432906233 0.236089414692 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159811099858 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155078929861 0.0737576698707 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353498967753 0.150856017488 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167460874054 0.0645574589148 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.