communal online encyclopedias
The reading states that the online encyclopedias are less valuable than the printed one, but the professor brings reasons that show online encyclopedias can be trustable.
First, the reading mentiones there are lots of errors in online encyclopedias because they are written by nonexperts, While the professor states that niether traditional nore online encyclopedias are close to accurate and these errors sometimes remain for decade in tranditional ones because they are printed.
Secondly, while the reading says that online encyclopedias are exposed the risk of hacking, the professor suggests two strategys that keep them from changes. First, she mentiones that the source of online encyclopedias can be in read format that are not changable. Secondly, specialists can be hired to eliminate all these changes.
At last, although the passage mentiones that online encyclopedias show trivial information that are not important, the listening states that the best advantages of online encyclopedias are great diversity of information they provide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
- Essay topics: TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new f 70
- TPO 53 Integrated Writing Task 52
- Getting a job in which you work with other people are better than getting a job in which you work alone. 60
- Tpo 50 - Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. 3
- T P O 53 Integrated Writing Tasks-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 157.0 270.72406181 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74522292994 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01036116299 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 145.348785872 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.8931578213 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.333333333 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379972333676 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210395109659 0.0996497079465 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10664892354 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266639506255 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501827357899 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.3589403974 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.8541721854 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.2367328918 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.